The Weekley Standard Blog has an awesome piece about Obama’s total lack of understanding about the military structure.

There is a lot about Obama’s story that makes no sense. Let us start with the opening line:

“You know, I’ve heard from an Army captain who was the head of a rifle platoon–supposed to have 39 men in a rifle platoon. Ended up being sent to Afghanistan with 24 because 15 of those soldiers had been sent to Iraq.”

Well, captains command companies, not rifle platoons. A rifle platoon is normally commanded by a 2nd lieutenant, sometimes (if short handed) by a senior sergeant. So for starters, Obama betrays a woeful ignorance of military organization and the chain of command. Then he remarks that the platoon was under-strength because 15 of its men had been “sent to Iraq.” Sorry, the Army doesn’t work that way. Platoons are organic units, consisting of three rifle squads, a heavy weapons squad, and a headquarters section. You can’t break it up. It is the smallest building block in the infantry that can conduct fire-and-movement tactics.

There is quite a bit more, but I have to include the closing

Overall, I think Obama would be better sticking to his “message of hope”–hope that nobody will ever ask him to make any substantive statements on military affairs, ever again.

While the NYT has been busy with their hit and run against Sen. McCain all the Dem strategists come talking heads have been touting a similar phrase, “where there is smoke, there’s fire”.  If that’s the case, then Obama’s house is burning down because Rezko and his dirty dollars bought it. From today’s Wall Street Journal 

While the Chicago trial doesn’t involve Sen. Obama, it puts the candidate’s ties to Mr. Rezko back in the spotlight. Mr. Rezko is under indictment for extortion, and prosecutors will try to prove he used connections with state politicians and appointees to orchestrate kickback schemes. The 52-year-old real-estate developer, a key player in the Illinois political establishment, has pleaded not guilty. When asked if the timing of the trial could be problematic for the Obama campaign, spokesman Bill Burton said, “By now it is well-established that Sen. Obama is not involved in the matters at issue in the trial.” Sen. Clinton laid into her rival in a debate last month over his ties to Mr. Rezko, whom she labeled a “slum landlord,” and her campaign has suggested that Mr. Rezko played a bigger role in Sen. Obama’s professional and personal life than the candidate has acknowledged.  

Obama gets his own record wrong!

OBAMA’S STATEMENT

KING: Tonight, Senator Obama, you’ve talked about more transparency. You also at one point criticized earmarks. And yet, a recent report came out that identified you — lower on the list in terms how much money senators seek and sneak into the budget for these pork barrel spending projects, but it still said you were responsible for $91 million in earmarks. And you have refused to say where the money went, what it’s for. Why?

OBAMA: No, that’s not true. We’ve actually disclosed, John, all our earmarks. And so, you know, we’ll be happy to provide you with that information, because I believe very strongly in transparency.

THE TRUTH

Obama Has Refused To Disclose His Earmark Requests For 2005 And 2006. “Since last year, he has publicly released the letters he submits to the Appropriations Committee seeking support for the spending items, but has not released those submitted to the committee in 2005 and 2006.” (Paul Kane, “Candidates’ Earmarks Worth Millions,” The Washington Post, 2/14/08, page A1, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/13/AR2008021303635.html)

In the 109th and 110th Congresses Barack Obama was the lead sponsor on 116 bills. Of that pathetically small effort, only one–one!–was passed and signed into law. That huge legislative achievement? S. 2125, a bill to “promote relief, security, and democracy in the Democratic Republic of Congo” became law in December 2006. (S. 2125, Became Law 12/22/06). For those of you keeping score at home thats a 1.6% rate of passage from the junior Senator from Illinois.

Barack Obama cited JFK in defending his misguided Cuba policy, but JFK imposed the embargo he is trying to sidestep…

Barack Obama Sites President Kennedy In Defending His Cuba Policy Obama: “I support the eventual normalization. And it’s absolutely true that I think our policy has been a failure. … I think it is important for us to have the direct contact, not just in Cuba, but I think this principle applies generally. I recall what John F. Kennedy once said, that we should never negotiate out of fear, but we should never fear to negotiate. And this moment, this opportunity when Fidel Castro has finally stepped down, I think, is one that we should try to take advantage of.” (http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/02/21/debate.transcript/)

Yet JFK Imposed The Current Policy Of Isolating Cuba: “The embargo, which began in 1960 during the Eisenhower administration with a ban on U.S. exports to Cuba except for food and medicine, was extended on Feb. 7, 1962, by President Kennedy to ban all imports from Cuba to the United States, including the Cuban cigars that Kennedy had a special fondness for. The aim was to financially strangle Cuba and force a change in the communist-run government.” (Martin Crutsinger, “Cuban Trade Embargo Expected to Remain”, Associated Press, 2/20/2008)

Barack Obama O’Drama has captured the heart of his fellow dramatists out in liberal Hollywood. Wooed by his Pied Piper siren song, the leftists who spend the millions bashing America and all we stand for, have begun to coalesce around the liberal, freshmen senator from Chicago.

Of course, this is a natural fit - the actors and actresses famed for their imaginations and grounded in their false realities are inherently drawn to Barack Obama’s overly dramatic and downright depressing view of America. For instance, Daniel Henninger paraphrases Obama:

“…lies awake at night wondering how he’s going to pay the bills . . . she works the night shift after a full day of college and still can’t afford health care for a sister who’s ill . . . the senior I met who lost his pension when the company he gave his life to went bankrupt . . . the teacher who works at Dunkin’ Donuts after school just to make ends meet . . . I was not born into money or status . . . I’ve fought to bring jobs to the jobless in the shadow of a shuttered steel plant . . . to make sure people weren’t denied their rights because of what they looked like or where they came from . . . Now we carry our message to farms and factories.”

And so, George Clooney, Susan Surandon, and Haley Berry….

“He walks into a room and you want to follow him somewhere, anywhere,” says George Clooney.

“I’ll do whatever he says to do,” says actress Halle Berry. “I’ll collect paper cups off the ground to make his pathway clear.”

I’m nervous because nobody’s quite sure what Obama stands for, even his supporters. (“I can’t wait to see,” said actress/activist Susan Sarandon, declaring full support nonetheless).

…all are drawn to him like moths to a flame.

Barack, your drama may be tempting to listen to, but your policies are nothing more than the typical, tired, and failed liberal ideas of the past. More government, more bureaucracy, more spending - more and more and more of the current system that is failing to solve our problems now.

Mr. O’Drama, tear down this wall* of rhetoric so that America can see you for the liberal you really are!

*Since we’re in the business of “borrowing” words.

Clinton = 50%

Obama = 45%

http://trailblazers.beloblog.com/archives/2008/02/new-texas-poll-hillary-holds-t.html#comments

Apparently his Texas surrogate had a tough time. When Chris Matthews starts giving a Dem a hard time, you know there’s a glaring problem with the candidate.

Campaign surrogate STUMPED on Obama’a legislative accomplishments

Have you joined STORM, the action network for College Republicans across the country? If not, make sure you signup at storm.collegerepublicans.org - and invite five friends to join you on there! Once you login and confirm your account, customize your profile and upload a cool pic of yourself.

Don’t forget to join your CR school chapter as well. Join by using your school email when you first signup or by finding your chapter in the Chapter list and confirming via a school email. Quite simple! (Don’t see your school listed? Drop us an email with the Chapter Name, Chairman Name and School Email Address, and the State in which the school is located.)

Start STORMing today…and inviting your friends to join you in this exciting new network exclusively for College Republicans!!

storm.collegerepublicans.org

Nancy Pelosi has developed quite an amazing ability to stick her foot in her mouth right when it will be the most noticeable. While Nancy Pelosi is saying things like this,

“There haven’t been gains, Wolf,” the speaker replied. “The gains have not produced the desired effect, which is the reconciliation of Iraq. This is a failure. This is a failure. The troops have succeeded, God bless them. We owe them the greatest debt of gratitude for their sacrifice, their patriotism, and for their courage and to their families as well.” [Emphasis mine]

Meanwhile, Al-Qaeda is signing a different tune. In recently released copies of letters intercepted between the leaders of Al-Qaeda in Iraq, the terrorists in charge sound the alarm that everything around them is falling apart.

 “This created weakness and psychological defeat. This also created panic, fear and the unwillingness to fight. The morale of the fighters went down . . . There was a total collapse in the security structure of the organisation.”

and this:

“There were almost 600 fighters in our sector before the tribes changed course 360 degrees . . . Many of our fighters quit and some of them joined the deserters . . . As a result of that the number of fighters dropped down to 20 or less.”

and this:

“The Islamic State of Iraq [al-Qaeda] is faced with an extraordinary crisis, especially in al-Anbar province. Al-Qaeda’s expulsion from Anbar created weakness and psychological defeat. This also created panic, fear and the unwillingness to fight.

Of course, Nancy Pelosi and her fellow Democrats have never been to keen on things like facts. They tend to get in the way of their agenda…