Give me a break! This guy (Barack Obama) is now trying to court the Jewish vote by attempting to relate his losing a Congressional race in Chicago to what the people of Israel endure everyday in horrible acts of terrorism. Take this passage:

When I ran against Bobby Rush [for Congress], the perception was that I was Hyde Park, I’m University of Chicago, I’ve got all these Jewish friends. When I started organizing, the two fellow organizers in Chicago were Jews, and I was attacked for associating with them. So I’ve been in the foxhole with my Jewish friends, so when I find on the national level my commitment being questioned, it’s curious. [Emphasis mine]

Really Barack? You enduring some politics by association hardships in your failed candidacy for Congress is comparable to innocent people in Israel being blown apart by savage terrorists? Your inexperience is showing…

On top of this, Barack was widely known in his early days in Chicago to have been associating with radicals on the Palestinian side of the argument and only came around to support Israel when he realized it would be politically advantageous for a future life in politics. (See this article about Barack’s ascent in Chi-Town’s machine politics).

Now, if that wasn’t ridiculous enough, Barack then trains his perceptive foreign policy analytical skills on the current situation in Israel with this earth-shattering, bold observation:

The lack of a resolution to this problem provides an excuse for anti-American militant jihadists to engage in inexcusable actions, and so we have a national-security interest in solving this, and I also believe that Israel has a security interest in solving this because I believe that the status quo is unsustainable. I am absolutely convinced of that[…] [Emphasis mine]

Are you joking?! Is that supposed to be some sort of bold proclamation condemning terrorism - that Israel probably can’t sustain itself if it continues to be bombarded by rocket attacks, suicide bomber, and radical jihadists of all stripes into perpetuity?

That Barack Obama is just now stumbling onto these facts should be very disturbing to anyone interested in national security and foreign policy, its domestic impact, and the impact on allied nations like Israel who is engaged in a fight for their very survival against these monstrous and cowardly terrorists.

Today in Ohio President Bush laid out some hard truth for the Democrats and anyone else pushing for retreat in Iraq - it’s a dumb idea. Referencing comments made by Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon, President Bush said:

“When it takes time for Iraqis to reach agreement, it is not foot-dragging, as one senator described it during Congress’ two-week Easter recess. It is a revolutionary undertaking that requires great courage.”

He also pointed out that the Iraqi accomplished a feat that our Congress often finds quite trying - passing a budget.

Of course, a great deal of political progress has been made in Iraq recently, but the Democrats are “staying the course” in their calls for an immediate and ill-advised retreat claiming they know better than the president, the military, and the intelligence community where the real terrorist threat is coming from - yet-to-be-constructed and entirely secure American military bases surrounding Iraq. At least, that’s where they’d like to relocate our troops - away from killing terrorists and onto bases in already secured areas. Surely a winning strategy.

Meanwhile, President Bush has this question for them,

“If America’s strategic interests are not in Iraq, the convergence point for the twin threats of al-Qaida and Iran, the nation Osama bin Laden’s deputy has called the place for the greatest battle, the country at the heart of the most volatile region on earth, then where are they?”

Good question! He also succinctly summed up the positions of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton on Iraq:

“No matter what shortcomings these critics diagnose, their prescription is always the same: retreat,” Bush said.

Maybe Nancy Pelosi, Barack, and Sen. Clinton had better leave the War on Terror to the people that want to win…

The first standing ovation of the night come from the Republican side cheering President Bush’s steadfast commitment to make tax relief permanent. Funny that the Dems didn’t stand for that…could one say they are anti-tax relief? Would that really be a surprise?